Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death emo

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 00:50, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Death emo
Original research (introduces a neologism, in this case almost inventing the word). Very few hits with Google for the term and most of these are from blogs or message boards, and lists with the words "death" and "emo" in succession (ie. death, emo). "Death emo" coupled with any of the bands produce even lesser hits. --Ilpanula 17:11, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree wholeheartedly. --Eschon 17:56, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Couldn't agree more. Smoddy | &epsilon;&iota;&pi;&epsilon;&tau;&epsilon; 22:26, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, original research, neologism. Megan1967 00:51, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * NOT DELETE!!!, death-emo is definitely a genre, if not an "official" genre it is definitely a sub-genre whether Google says it is or not!
 * This by this anon, whose only contribution is this vote. Smoddy | &epsilon;&iota;&pi;&epsilon;&tau;&epsilon; 13:25, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Il's reasons are well stated and the last thing we need is another flavor of emo, anyway. Jgm 03:13, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not because I loath emo, but that death emo is not a branch of emo.
 * Above vote was by User:Red dwarf. --Idont Havaname 00:59, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons already stated. --Idont Havaname 00:59, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete but make a subcategory of emo --Smooth Henry 05:18, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.