Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death industrial


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Owen&times; &#9742;  13:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Death industrial

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not seem to be notable. Google searches show that the expression is used but return almost no substantial coverage, nothing in news, books, or scholar. The information that some artists have produced death industrial music is not cited at all. Nor is there even enough information in the article so that a listener would know that he is listening to death industrial music rather than some other sub-genre. Jaque Hammer (talk) 22:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect and merge with power electronics, which seems to be the closest related genre. I see plenty of people talking about the term, although I have yet to find a solid secondary source discussing it in detail, so I think it's likely to be used as a search term. —Torchiest talkedits 11:11, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. HHaeyyn89 (talk) 20:46, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   06:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 04:04, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment It's listed as a genre here, here, and here. Reviews here, here, here, and here use the term to describe albums.  Like I said, there's nothing substantial describing what exactly the genre is, but the term gets thrown around a lot, and should be preserved as a redirect, since it's likely to be used as a search term. —Torchiest talkedits 12:30, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Per the sources and rationle found by Torchiest.  Lugnuts  (talk) 09:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge with power electronics --Whiteguru (talk) 09:48, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.