Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death knight (Dungeons & Dragons)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that it doesn't show standalone notability and isn't suitable content Nosebagbear (talk) 16:08, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Death knight (Dungeons & Dragons)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This fails to establish notability. The reception is one of several trivial lists in that book. TTN (talk) 14:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - per WP:GAMEGUIDE for material that is essentially from the game guide and the rest does not meet WP:GNG. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 14:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not supposed to be a monster manual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:GAMEGUIDE Chetsford (talk) 18:20, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - The only non-primary source actually talking about the D&D version being used in the article is the "For Dummies" book, and as that was written by employees of Wizards of the Coast who are designers of the game, its independence its highly debatable. Searching for additional sources regarding the D&D version also brought up nothing substantial in reliable, secondary sources, thus making the topic fail the WP:GNG.  The sources talking about the concept of Death Knights appearing in completely different games and media are, of course, irrelevant to establishing any  kind of notability for the D&D version.  Rorshacma (talk) 18:39, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom as failing WP:GNG. Question - should Death knight be kept either, seeing as this is the only non-PTM page on it?ZXCVBNM (TALK) 00:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.