Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Jessie Earl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America1000 13:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Death of Jessie Earl

 * – ( View AfD View log )

As per WP:NOTNEWS. While news resurfaced due to parents wanting the case re-opened, no long-lasting effects. Simply another tragic occurrence.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I did consider this issue when creating the article and decided it was notable per WP:EVENTCRITERIA points 1,2 and 4. The sad chain of events begins with the disappearance of Jessie Earl in 1980, then the case was re-opened in 1989 and 2000, now in 2020 there are further developments, all of which demonstrates enduring historical significance. At every stage the event received national mainstream media coverage. Mujinga (talk) 16:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - even after decades, still receives highly significant coverage (e.g. ) Spiderone  08:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  09:24, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - this is more than just a normal tragedy, as it is still receiving coverage even after 40 years. Foxnpichu (talk) 10:24, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.