Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of JonBenét Ramsey theories


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted WP:G7. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 02:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Death of JonBenét Ramsey theories

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has several problems, and is fundamentally just duplicating the topic of the Death of JonBenét Ramsey article. It is not clear that there is anything here that really needs to be preserved and is not already in the other article. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Smerge and delete. The article exists because a tiny handful of people won't accepot that the amount of detail they want about conspiracy theories, is excessive. Sorry, but it is excessive. None of them is genuinely important. I doubt even Alex Jones believes them. Guy (Help!) 23:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - I thought we were talking about this on the talk page. Thoughtful (light-handed) merging seemed to be the genesis of that discussion - but there was also discussion about changes to improve the main article. I was just going to move it to drafts and I see that the deletion tag was applied.  Is it possible for me to move it to drafts at this point?


 * Either way, there's no lead to link to that page any longer, so I'll start removing links to the article.✅


 * If not, I am fine at this point of going right to delete. There are too many endless conversations about the main article to start with. There's no need to start an entire new conversation about this.— CaroleHenson &thinsp; (talk) 00:54, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I opened the discussion here because it seemed like the Talk page discussion wasn't resulting in action. In my view, the article is so inadequate and such an obvious duplication of effort that the situation should not be allowed to continue. To me, moving the article to the Draft namespace doesn't seem desirable since it is not really something intended to eventually become an article on Wikipedia. —BarrelProof (talk) 01:03, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It's fine with me at this point to have it deleted. Again, I don't see any use in prolonging this discussion. I would like to apply an author-requested CSD - and then a closer can close this discussion out, per what has been said here and at the article talk page.— CaroleHenson &thinsp; (talk) 01:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.