Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deaths Worse Than Fate

Deaths Worse Than Fate
An online free novel by an otherwise unknown writer. JFW | T@lk  17:11, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. JFW | T@lk  17:11, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. not notable enough. --Bucephalus 17:12, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

[[User:Mo0|Mo0 [ talk ] ]] 21:18, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. -- Antaeus Feldspar 17:20, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable self-promotion. David Johnson 17:51, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Spam. How can it be the first book in the "Fates series," when there is only one of them?  Geogre 19:24, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertising. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 19:37, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. El spammo.  Totally unencyclopedic to boot. - Lucky 6.9 20:52, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. A free book can be found in many other places, they don't need ads here.
 * Don't Delete. We list poorly drawn webcomics and sites featuring men showing their rectums.  This at least is interesting.
 * Delete --fvw* 00:29, 2004 Nov 24 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ad. Jayjg 20:59, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete. The point is not only the story being a free book, but the author shaping it following his reader's comments. Like a moderated wiki used on a novel. Richy 10:58, 25 Nov 2004 (GMT +1)
 * Delete CheeseDreams 22:52, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete As the maligned author, I can say for certain that this is not self-promotion; I didn't post this. As I am familiar with your site, it does seems to list items such as this.  As an above user pointed out, this site lists webcomics and the goatse man.  The latter is expounded upon as though he were the fifth Beatle.  If you choose to delete, choose to delete.  Just don't do so out of elitism or snobbery.  Xen 22:52, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. [[User:Squash|Squash (Talk) ]] 06:32, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)