Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deaths in 1994


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 15:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Deaths in 1994
I'm not sure what this article is supposed to be. It says "Deaths in 1994, then April, then 5, and then it talks about Kurt Cobain for about one sentence. Since there is a list of deaths on the 1994 article, I see no need to waste Wikispace with this. Captain Jackson 04:33, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Dupe info, as per nom. --InShaneee 04:55, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't seem to be similar articles that list deaths in certain years, just one line about Cobain as Cap Jackson said. --Lightdarkness 05:07, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as listcruft -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:26, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * nuke as listcruft Segv11 (talk/contribs) 07:00, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. --Terence Ong 09:40, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant with 1994 and Category:1994 deaths. Punkmorten 10:45, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This is already covered with Category:1994_deaths, so there is no research advantage in dedicating a page to the subject. (aeropagitica) 12:49, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Mushintalk 17:59, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominated -- Krash 19:37, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * We've got a problem - the existence of Deaths in 2005, Deaths in 2004, Deaths in 2003, Deaths in 2002, and [{Deaths in 2001]]. I agree that this particular page, listing Cobain and no one else, is not really worth it - but what about consistency? DS 14:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve the article to be consistent with the articles from other years. It already appears the article is having new names entered and will continue to have so I believe. Evil Eye 16:29, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment, surely it makes a lot more sense for the other deaths in articles to be deleted and merged as well, as doing the opposite (moving all deaths to deaths in articles) would ultimately require a lot more work, which is really unnecessary. Mushintalk 22:12, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.