Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debate on Standards for Judging the Truth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:41, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Debate on Standards for Judging the Truth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The only coverage I could find was on the china.org.cn website, and that is HARDLY a reliable source. The article fails to satisfy notability guidelines and lacks enough coverage to assert notability.  James ( T •  C ) • 10:14pm • 11:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: I only found china.org.cn and Wikipedia reprints. SL93 (talk) 00:24, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 19 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Even the zh version is an unreferenced stub. The meat of this debate is found at Two Whatevers.  This content should not be in its own article.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 02:19, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge or redirect to Two Whatevers. What we have here is little more than a definition.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:46, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.