Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debated questions regarding the procreation and existence of certain Narnian creatures.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 04:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Debated questions regarding the procreation and existence of certain Narnian creatures.

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research. Corvus cornix 22:25, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, complete OR--Jac16888 22:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is more like a project/essay made without any sources.--JForget 22:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, unsourced essay/OR. Doesn't belong at all. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 22:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unsalvagable original research. -WarthogDemon 22:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - or totally rewrite. As I recall there is no discussion in the various stories about the reproductive mechanisms, and mating habits of the various creatures.  Looks like all original research.  If some actual research exists....please put it in?  --Rocksanddirt 22:34, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced original research. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:39, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and consider BJAODNing. Original research, no secondary sources provided.  17Drew 22:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I did move it to my own, newly formed BJAODN... Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 23:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You forgot the period in the title. It's Debated questions regarding the procreation and existence of certain Narnian creatures. not Debated questions regarding the procreation and existence of certain Narnian creatures In fact, the period in the title might actually make it BJAODN-quality. Bart133 (t) (c) 23:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Period added. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 23:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'm not sure if it qualifies for BJAODNing, but it's unsalvageable OR. I've read the books and they never even allude to procreation of Narnian creatures. Besides, it would be unencyclopedic even if there was actually actually research. It should be moved to "Symbolism that Doesn't Exist Wiki". Bart133 (t) (c) 23:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - it seems like someone had a lot of time to think about this topic, and decided to write an unsourced list of their thoughts on the subject. --Haemo 23:59, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not a bad essay, but essays are what Wikipedia is Not. Resolute 04:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR and WP:DAFT. What a title! Grutness...wha?  05:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete toss a WP:SNOW at it! Spazure 07:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Article creator removed the AfD tag and replaced it with the following. Administrative action on my part, I have no opinion on the AfD. CosmicPenguin (Talk) 20:56, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thr reason for this page's existence is for the archival of the clues and incosistencies regrrding who certain narnian species were brought to life and reproduce,Note:Please do not delete this page.
 * Reasoning isn't the same thing as making an argument, based on policy, for why it should be kept. There's lots of policies -- some even conflict. If you truly want it to be kept, you can likely find a good policy to support your stance. Spazure 02:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete It's not a debate unless someone cares enough to debate with you. Say, why did the castaways take all their belongings with them on a three hour tour?  And was it the dog, or the farmer, whose name was Bingo?  Mandsford 16:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * hmmm, never thought about that before, dog or farmer? What's the castaways one about though?--Jac16888 16:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The latter was from a ballad authored by the American poet, Sherwood Charles Schwartz (1916- ), a poem which the 1960s philosopher R. Osbourne Denver (1935-2005) described as "the voluntarily memorized anthem for an entire generation of American schoolchildren".  Mandsford 18:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Bingo (song) "states based on proper usage of grammar, one can assume Bingo is referred to as the dog's name." --  Jreferee  (Talk) 09:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as original research, unless someone can find discussion of this subject in some Lewis/Narnia journal. In that (unlikely) event, move to some less cumbersome title. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 10:37, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - I think this article is someone's way of gathering information for a school exercise. In issue 42 of Australian Screen Education, the magazine proposes that Primary school and middle years teachers "encourage students to work in pairs or small groups to investigate mythological creatures and legendary tales to discover the basis for some Narnian creatures."


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.