Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debayan Ghosh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The arguments that the sources are inadequate to establish notability (either because they are non-independent interviews or not actually about him) carry the day. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Debayan Ghosh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems not to satisfy WP:BIO. Maybe his company might be notable (no article for that; no idea), but the man himself appears to have received very limited coverage. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 10:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 10:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I reviewed most of the references and they are not about him, they are all either about the company or interview about the company. He doesn't have sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG himself. –Ammarpad (talk) 13:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Strongly Keep - well referenced. Makhamakhi (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Demonstrably not. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Subject is notable enough to have a Wikipedia page. I think the creator have missed few good citations about the subject, i have mentioned those in references. DJRSD (talk) 16:37, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, both of these sources are worthless for establishing the subject's notability. The first is an incidental mention in a listing, the second is a quote soundbite as you can get from any company owner. - Might I add that adding these two refs and commenting here are the editor's only contributions, so I call COI. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. neither he nor the company are notable. There is no reliable reference, except to the publication of his very small number of scientific papers. Interviews with the subject of the sort listed here are not considered reliable secondary sources.   DGG ( talk ) 06:38, 23 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.