Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah C. Peel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 04:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Deborah C. Peel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are some indications of notability, but overall I didn't feel it was fully proved by reliable sources. After being tagged for over six and a half years for notability, it needs to be resolved either way. Boleyn (talk) 14:03, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 23 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete This person runs a small non-profit organization (~$250K/yr). Before the person could be considered notable, I would think that the organization would be notable. Although Peel is interviewed at times on news shows, there are no 3rd-party resources that I can find. LaMona (talk) 15:55, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  17:42, 31 August 2014 (UTC)



Delete. Fails WP:NPERSON. --Mr. Guye (talk) 21:35, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.