Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah H. Quazzo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 07:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Deborah H. Quazzo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No significant coverage. There are some mentions and interviews but nothing significant to meet WP:ANYBIO. CNMall41 (talk) 02:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CNMall41 (talk) 02:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep I am seeing some in-depth coverage, or at least multiple references that can be combined to demonstrate notability, although not for her business career.
 * https://marketbrief.edweek.org/marketplace-k-12/chicago_school_board_member_faces_scrutiny_over_ed_investments/
 * https://marketbrief.edweek.org/marketplace-k-12/chicago_board_member_deborah_quazzo_to_step_down_at_end_of_term/
 * https://inthesetimes.com/article/how-to-sell-off-a-city
 * I am unable to access it for some reason, but there’s also apparently a Chicago Sun Times on that financial controversy.
 * Combined with the business career (which has even resulted in the occasional cite of publications she’s listed as an author on, per Google Scholar), I think the coverage of that controversy is probably enough to just squeak her over the edge. Jo7hs2 (talk) 03:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Florida.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep in line with what Jo7hs2 to say.Historyday01 (talk) 00:25, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I see two articles in an industry publication and another in a Chicago publication. Can you help me understand how this would be seen as significant coverage? Maybe I am not looking at this correctly but if we use these three references as a model, I could pretty much create a Wikipedia page on most educators. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:25, 28 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 20:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Market Brief is not a reliable source (it's an industry publication with no editorial oversight). Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. And with a high citation count of 4, clearly doesn't not meet WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel 5969  TT me 00:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Coverage is all press-releases. No coverage of this individual we can use. What's given above isn't much either. Oaktree b (talk) 20:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Nothing in article or BEFORE showed IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth
 * Source eval:
 * Bloomberg database bio page :: 1. "Deborah H. Quazzo: Executive Profile & Biography - Bloomberg". www.bloomberg.com. Retrieved 2019-05-09.
 * ROUTINE :: 2. ^ Jump up to:a b Editor, Sean Cavanagh Senior (2015-06-02). "Chicago Board Member Deborah Quazzo to Step Down at End of Term". Market Brief. Retrieved 2019-05-10. : |last= has generic name (help)
 * Mention, not SIGCOV :: 3. ^ "BrightCHAMPS establishes Global Curriculum Advisory Board". Financialexpress. Retrieved 2023-01-06.
 * Our Team page, not IS RS :: 4. ^ "Our Team". GSV Ventures. Retrieved 2023-01-25.
 * Mention, not SIGCOV :: 5. ^ Desk, Outlook Start-Up (2022-08-26). "BrightCHAMPS acquires English-learning platform Schola". startup.outlookindia.com/. Retrieved 2023-02-08.
 * The above mentioned sources are two from Marketwatch (not IS RS with SIGCOV), and a mention in an article about Rahm Emanuel.
 * WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.