Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Smith Ford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While it being a autobiography or a paid biography is not a reason for deletion, lack of notability sure is. So Why  17:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Deborah Smith Ford

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Entirely non-notable and probably an autobiography given that Special:Contributions/Jannajoos has only created this page yesterday and is just expanding it and linking all of Ford's non-notable roles (likely just an extra) to this page.

The page, if not deleted, is terribly written and needs WP:DYNAMITE, but I just don't see the notability to keep that. It's full of nonsense aggrandizement and weasel words and vague allusions and sentence fragments. And the top "reference" is to the Wikipedia main page. JesseRafe (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: not an autobiography, but per this edit summary, the SPA Jannajoos (who is evidently using her real name), identifies the subject of this article as "[her] client". Put paid editor notice on her talk page. JesseRafe (talk) 16:20, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Further note: Janna Joos can't seem to help themselves on their own talk page (and is probably rewriting another missive to no one as we speak or otherwise continuing WP:NOTGETTINGIT), but I just wanted to point out somewhere that someone has been trying to make an article on Ford for over a decade, whether another manager (or Manage her?) or Ford herself. Not worth an SPI, but it's definitely a concerted effort by:
 * A lot of similar language and tone used in the above (film talk page requests, user pages as articles, etc.) as found on this article. Of note here, is that all of these accounts seem to have an obvious COI regarding this subject, not organic page creation attempts. JesseRafe (talk) 20:41, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. JesseRafe (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. JesseRafe (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. JesseRafe (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. JesseRafe (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. JesseRafe (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. JesseRafe (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. JesseRafe (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. JesseRafe (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:29, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete A WP:BEFORE found no independent reliable source to pass WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. CASSIOPEIA(talk</b>)
 * Keep there is time to delete - one day after the article was started we push to delete? WP:NORUSH. This is a pre-internet subject and not all sources will be WP:GHITS Wm335td (talk) 19:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Wikipedia has rules against autobiographies for reasons, we need to make them have teeth.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. A search yielded no substantial sources. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NACTOR.4meter4 (talk) 12:48, 9 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.