Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Tarr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Deborah Tarr

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG I can find no in depth coverage in reliable sources, just the usual online galleries etc. Theroadislong (talk) 16:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Subject lacks independent coverage in reliabel sources. Meatsgains (talk) 17:43, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:47, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:48, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:48, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable artist with no coverage in good sources, and I searched.96.127.244.11 (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Run-of-the-mill artist, pleasant enough but of no particular art-historical or cultural importance. Doesn't appear to have detailed coverage in either popular media or art-historical texts, and doesn't meet criteria about having work in major collections, major solo shows at important galleries, art historical importance, or any other stand-out achievement. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:53, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.