Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah presley brando


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:26, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Deborah presley brando

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete &minus; Absolute non-sense. Serious WP:LIBEL issues. —  Fly by Night  ( talk )  01:00, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Although the sources appear to back up that a claim was made against Brando's will, even if true, then she would only be notable by relationship with other notable people, and notability is not inherited  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 01:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Yeesh... (Is that a valid deletion rationale?) Carrite (talk) 03:01, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Pure nonsense. Absolutely untrue. Actual quote for a source listed on page: ""I believe there were suspicious activities surrounding his death," asserts Deborah, whose claim to be Elvis' daughter was rejected by a judge in 1988." (http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2008/01/30/2008-01-30_wild_christian_brando_death_scene.html) - If her claim to be Elvis' daughter was rejected, then why does the wiki page say that she was found to be his daughter?? MissPageantNews (talk) 22:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The claim is in the article (there is sourcing for the claim), but the "court finding" bit has been removed (someone else removed it before I had a chance to).  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 23:53, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep -Give her time to add content before you decide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debdey78 (talk • contribs) 23:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC)  — Debdey78 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED and the libelous claims made.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 16:51, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

So why is she mentioned on wikipedia's Christian Brando's article, in the content "marriage and spousal abuse?", that could be considered as nonsense too! and she has a million "mainstream media" good and verifiable sources all over Print and internet. what makes someone notable? Her claim was overturned by the Tenessee courts from non illigitimate to illigitimate but without inheritance rights. please, do your homework before concluding. thx --Antoniomecheri (talk) 00:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC) Also, you have a page about Bonnie Lee Bakley, which was the wife of Robert Blake, Bonnie_Lee_Bakley, who based on your arguments she does not qualify as notable by marriage, (same case as Deborah Presley Brando)!!! or by inheritance, but yet you have a page of her ??? why are you discriminating here? a similar article can be written about Deborah, yet she is more notable than Bonnie, that i can tell you. check it out! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antoniomecheri (talk • contribs) 00:57, 7 July 2011 (UTC)