Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debs and grads


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 17:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Debs and grads

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The "article! is complete nonsense; no refs, no links, no anything. Sarah777 (talk) 19:55, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions.  --  Beloved  Freak  20:43, 2 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't really see a valid reason for deletion in this nomination. Yes, it's unreferenced, but references can be added, if they are available. It's not "complete nonsense" at all.-- Beloved Freak  20:45, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment It makes sense to me, and I rather think that the phrase is well-known in Ireland: here are four news items, , and .  Sergeant Cribb (talk) 20:47, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Incompleteness is not a reason for deletion — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 23:01, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article is incomplete, and it does not have any reference to sustain its notability (the verifiability factor), however a preliminary research gives a good background to be either added or sourced to the article, thus it is notable and should be kept. Eduemoni↑talk↓  23:08, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. No references is at least one reference too short in my book, but the content is not that badly written, and my only concern is whether it is research. As for deletion, the casual way the term is used goes great ways to show how notable it is (at least for Ireland), which is to be expected as it refers to a life event that many citizens are unremarkably familiar with. Nowhere near WP:NEOLOGISM - frankieMR (talk) 22:53, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.