Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decay (game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 03:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Decay (game)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't appear to meet the notability guidelines of WP:GNG. Any of the sources found online were self-published or just gave a brief description of the game and how to purchase it. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:30, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —Inks.LWC (talk) 23:35, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  Inks.LWC (talk) 23:35, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - There are a number of online reviews and interviews, but not from sites that meet our reliability requirements. Marasmusine (talk) 10:39, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Marasmusine. --Veyneru (talk) 16:52, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Are you guys not feeling the Indie love or something? I'm not going to stress myself out by working on the article 24/7. That's never going to happen. I'm working on it bit by bit. I have lots of content in a Notepad document, but I am not going to submit it until I am absolutely satisfied with it. Anyway, it's not as if the article is causing any problems. I think you're being a bit too picky.

xx — Preceding unsigned comment added by GarythePotato (talk • contribs) 22:12, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete – It's not that we're against indie games, as I have enjoyed quite a share of them myself, but all I am seeing as far as coverage is concerned are coming from reader reviews, blogs, or forums – none of which are sufficiently reliable enough to establish notability. Don't get me wrong that indie games don't get covered by reliable sources, because they in fact do. I'm not seeing it here, though. –MuZemike 06:06, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.