Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/December 6 (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:52, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

December 6 (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No evidence that this book meets WP:NBOOK. No sources are provided that support notability. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 11:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, several sources including, and  to name a few, Sadads (talk) 13:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I managed to find at least three sources, one of which was the New York Times, covering this book extensively. It definitely qualifies under WP:NBOOK. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 21:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:BK. Joe Chill (talk) 22:32, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per the above reasons.  He  iro  04:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.