Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decepticon Clone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Decepticon Clone

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article has had no references for a long time. I don't think the subjects of this article could be notable. Delete. NotARealWord (talk) 18:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Sorta useless article. Mathewignash (talk) 20:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Mathewignash, it was you who changed the article to its current stub state by moving all the actual content into subarticles. Still, I think the article could be deleted or redirected if that's the consensus here. J I P  &#124; Talk 16:59, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources or evidence of the name's existence, much less notability. -Markeer 22:23, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete of all the countless Transformers articles up for deletion lately, I think this one may well be the very worst. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  22:25, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.