Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deck railing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Automatic Strikeout  ( T  •  C ) 01:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Deck railing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This appears to be a thinly disguised advertisement for the company linked in the External links section. Eeekster (talk) 04:17, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Trim down the mydecklrailings links and you'd have a decent article; it's substantially better than deletion, and easier too.  Nyttend (talk) 04:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I wrote this article and feel that this was a very well researched article with multiple resources. I have removed the external links section. It was a remnant of the citation lists. Thank you.Connieb8745 (talk) 05:22, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Eekster Viridae DON'T PANIC  09:18, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * But Eekster wants to delete. What do you mean?  Nyttend (talk) 14:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I meant per you. Viridae DON'T PANIC  05:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep There are plentiful sources including websites, TV programs, and several books on decking. The article doesn't look like an advert. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:37, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.