Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decline of the South Beach Scene


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was SPEEDY DELETED as hoax/trolling article created by socks of banned user. -GTBacchus(talk) 18:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Decline of the South Beach Scene
Part unsourced essay, part nonsense, 100% deletable. --AbsolutDan (talk) 16:06, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as it is obviously original research, and as the nominator points out, ther eis a strong component of seeming nonsense. Edward Wakelin 17:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Upgrade to Speedy Delete I'm starting to think we're the subject of a Borat style hoax. "There are really not many Brazlian sluts to be found in South Beach these days (except the prositutes)." Uh, no. - Richfife 17:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR. Plain and simple original research. Mitaphane talk 17:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. --N Shar 17:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete For just about any place, celebrity, magazine, band, comic strip, online game, company, website, ice-cream flavour, etc etc etc there are people out there who feel it isn't as good as it used to be. Oftentimes, they're absolutely right.  But it isn't the sort of thing an encyclopedia can reasonably cover.  Wikipedia is not a guide to the migration patterns of "sluts". Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:53, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Good lord. Delete per everyone. Natalie 20:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Natalie. :^) --Richard 08:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as POV, and as an unnecessary article; any verifiable and neutral portions of it could be easily added to the South Beach article. *Dan T.* 02:52, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as trolling. Pascal.Tesson 05:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; reasons should not have to be given for something as bizarre as this crap. The Crying Orc 09:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. In its totality, its an interesting and well written piece. Perfect T 18:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. I left a note for the author making him aware of the AfD and encouraging him to participate. --A. B. 19:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Speedy Delete. Unencyclopedic, unsourced, and uninteresting.--Stephan Schulz 20:46, 25 October 2006 (UTC) (upgraded to speedy after checking the history--Stephan Schulz 10:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC))
 * Strong Keep. How can you call this uninteresting?  As a lifelong native of Brasil that just moved here I certainly know what I'm talking about when to comes to hot sluts, that's why I moved to Miami anyway.  I am something of an expert in the field.  Wikipedia needs more experts does it not thank you? An-Mat.br 23:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment You do understand that the word "slut" is considered one of the worst insults there is in the English language, right? - Richfife 00:30, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment - both editors !voting "keep" have been indef blocked as sock-puppets of a banned user. Just saying... -GTBacchus(talk) 08:29, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.