Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deconstructing Dinner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:59, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Deconstructing Dinner

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article about a radio program, not reliably sourced as passing our notability criteria for radio programs. Although this makes potentially valid notability claims, it fails to reference them anywhere but the show's own self-published content about itself -- but the notability test isn't the things the article says, it's the depth and quality of the reliable source coverage about the show, in sources other than itself, that can or can't be shown to verify that the things the article says are true. A prior discussion at Articles for deletion/Canadian Voices landed no consensus, almost entirely because of a single person who argued that BCAST criteria were met on their face without showing any proper notability-building sources, but even in that discussion the only other person besides me who actually looked for sources agreed that he wasn't able to find enough. Bearcat (talk) 17:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:50, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete the sourcing is no where near what we would need to show that this radio program was notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:02, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:49, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks indepenedent sources from reliable publications to establish notability. Tulkijasi (talk) 10:09, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:RPRGM per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 03:46, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.