Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decorative vehicle lighting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 22:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Decorative vehicle lighting

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a procedural nomination, requested by here. I am neutral. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - The articles one reference is to a shopping sight, and the article isn't write in an encyclopedic fashion. 92.3.131.156 (talk) 11:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Automotive lighting as a primary subject. Nightfury 13:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Automobiles are not the only type of vehicle. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm not sure as to where you are going with that, as the article I quoted covers all motor vehicles? Nightfury 20:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Bicycles such as mine are not motor vehicles. A train would not normally be considered an automotive vehicle. Andrew🐉(talk) 21:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Speedy Keep as the nomination provides no reason to delete and so there is no case to answer. Myself, I have a variety of decorative lights for my bicycle so it looks like a Christmas tree when the occasion demands.  I especially like wheel lights that flash as they go round and you can get quite sophisticated ones that form pictures such as Monkey Lights. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Satisfies notability, and a useful topic. If the article needs work, improve it.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't believe it's worthwhile or notable,but if you do please go ahead. 92.3.131.156 (talk) 15:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - no adequate sourcing, no evidence that this is an encyclopedic topic. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  16:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources here or in the article (or that I can see in my BEFORE) suggest this topic meets WP:GNG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence this satisfies WP:N.<strong style="color:#555555">Pontificalibus 08:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Automobiles can also be decorated with Christmas lights at Christmastime"... well, yes, that's true, because one can technically decorate almost anything. Without sourcing to suggest that the lighting of conveyances for aesthetic purposes is a topic of note, this is not an encyclopedic topic. -- <strong style="color:blue">Kinu <i style="color: red">t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 02:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 07:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per material nominator (the IP user) — Alalch Emis (talk) 08:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is not a single source being used in the article, and none of the discussion over the last week in this AFD has turned up any, even the two Keep votes. Without significant coverage in reliable sources, this is a pretty clear failure of the WP:GNG.  Searching for sources shows that, yes, products like this do exist.  But there is no actual coverage or discussion of the concept that would show that this idea is any more notable than happening to place lights on any other object.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment This is one of those "mundane" articles - we know it exists, but can't find good sources. There is also a significant overlap with other topics. For example I found Underglow to be something which probably is a subset of this. Custom car is related. Automotive lighting is a superset. Not sure where exactly this fits it.--DreamLinker (talk) 13:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Does not meet GNG, is not an encyclopedic topic. Article is entirely an OR essay.  // Timothy :: talk  03:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.