Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dedert Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  03:33, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Dedert Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Many, Many problems. likely not notable, written promotionally being the big 2 Clone commando sev (talk) 02:36, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. Was deleted G11'd a week ago, see User talk:RazaqDesigner.  // Timothy :: talk  02:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * So this AFD might deserve a speedy delete then? Clone commando sev (talk) 05:33, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * AfD seemed a more permanent solution. If it returns it can then be G4'd and salted. No objection if it SNOWs to delete.  // Timothy :: talk  05:54, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: promo-only sources. Lokys dar Vienas (talk) 03:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Article is being edited and advertising content have been removed and tonned down. Thanks to everyone who's been contributing to this work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RazaqDesigner (talk • contribs) 09:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see any independent sourcing, just company-submitted profiles, press releases, and press release churnalism. - MrOllie (talk) 14:50, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @MrOllieThe article about Dedert Corporation has been toned down. You might want to take another look and close the discussion. Cheers. RazaqDesigner (talk) 18:29, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Of the 16 sources cited, most are primary/press releases (dedert, pharmaceuticalonline, anugafoodtec, just-food, powderbuilsolids, manufacturing, thomasnet, bignewsnetwork). The yahoo one is a press release for marketsandmarkets which I can't verify, but is only supporting that they have a 10,000sqft testing facility in Chicago, which frankly sounds pretty trivial. fortunebusinessinsights is likely just a scraper sector review of public/PR materials - not a great reputation for that firm. The only one that seems independent is the foodnavigator-usa piece, which is again pretty cursory. A secondary search turns up surprisingly few sources, and almost all are SEO/paid placement. It's not over-the-top spam like the previously deleted version of the article - I just don't see anything that would support WP:CORP.Sam Kuru (talk)
 * Delete per above. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.