Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeeJ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropa gitica) 22:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

DeeJ
Non-notable, probably vanity page Narcisse 15:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable artist. hateless 21:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * KEEP, What right do you have to chose if a person is famous or achieved enough to feature on wikipedia? Let the kid be... If you have a problem with it, instead of just flagging it to get deleted, edit it so it's acceptable. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rojerrabitos (talk • contribs) 00:47, September 8, 2006. - User's only edit other than a (now deleted) personal attack on nominator's userpage -- Vary | Talk 02:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * So who does have the right to decide? Or would you allow total anarchy? -- RHaworth 07:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Vanicruft. -- Vary | Talk 02:27, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- RHaworth 07:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.