Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dee Carstensen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  06:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Dee Carstensen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

NN musician - notability assertions not supported by reliable sources. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. UtherSRG (talk) 12:55, 16 June 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, United States of America,  and New York. UtherSRG (talk) 12:55, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Meets GNG. Here's sources for GNG
 * NYT SIGCOV/review
 * AllMusic review
 * more than a passing mention in an encyclopedia of music
 * more than a passing mention in Billboard
 * SIGCOV in a doctoral dissertation with at least one citation
 * We also have some decent coverage here that is not independent:
 * Billboard coverage with a couple quotes from subject
 * more Billboard coverage with quotes from subject
 * &mdash;siro&chi;o 06:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete The NYT is a blog discussion of the columnist's playlist, with about a paragraph for this artist. Hardly sigcov, somewhat reliable. AllMusic is fine. The first Billboard article is a photo caption, very "passing mention". Rest of the sources are about as useless for proving notability. Oaktree b (talk) 14:08, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Gsearch only brings up Spotify, social media and Soundcloud links. All non-useful for notability. Coverage above is trivial mentions of the subject. Oaktree b (talk) 14:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The NYT blog is definitely sigcov, describing the way the subject plays harp, the way the subject sings, production, relationships, diagnosis, etc. Via WP:SIGCOV Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material. &mdash;siro&chi;o 23:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Also, the cited doctoral dissertation is SIGCOV, not useless for proving notability. &mdash;siro&chi;o 23:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep this Billboard piece is significant coverage here and continues on another page, there's also the AllMusic review and the doctoral dissertation, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.