Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deeksha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  07:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Deeksha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No apparent evidence of notability. Lots of references, but either press releases or mentions such as "Analysing the paper, Dr. Milind, Vice-President, Deeksha Network said it was an easy paper...". Article created and almost entirely written by an editor who has edited solely on this article and on institutions with which Deeksha works (creating many articles on colleges of doubtful notability) and has not yet replied to an enquiry as to whether they have a COI. Pam D  15:57, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  16:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  16:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  16:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Wikipedian2017's request for Suggestions and advice
 * Hi Friends,


 * Kindly guide me in rewriting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deeksha so that it can be live always.


 * Looking forward for your reply. Thanks a lot in advance


 * Regards
 * Wikipedian2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipedian2017 (talk • contribs) 05:28, 7 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Please first reply to the question at User_talk:Wikipedian2017 about your relationship with Deeksha. And please remember to sign all your posts on talk pages, AfD discussions etc - the easiest way is to type  . Thank you.  Pam  D  06:23, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH and an 100% promo article based on WP:SPIP sources. Such content is excluded per WP:NOTSPAM. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Promotional, spam. Not notable.--Nizil (talk) 12:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.