Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeepRecce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

DeepRecce

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unable to find any significant coverage in reliable, independent sources that would meet the notability criteria at WP:CORP. VQuakr (talk) 05:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  09:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  09:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

This article is more about who setup the corp by and why. The individuals have notability. Kgilmour (talk)
 * Then the article should exist at Andrew Samsonoff and/or Ken Gilmour. At a glance, though, it doesn't appear that either of those people meet the similar notability guideline at WP:BASIC. VQuakr (talk) 16:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

In that case - you may delete the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kengilmour (talk • contribs) 16:18, 8 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:35, 14 March 2016 (UTC) *Delete: No evidence of notability found. Looks like a promo. Toddst1 (talk) 15:05, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as searches found nothing better. SwisterTwister   talk  05:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.