Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Blue Orchestra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nomination withdrawn and sources provided. Fences &amp;  Windows  00:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Deep Blue Orchestra

 * – (View AfD) (View log · AfD statistics)

Notability (WP:BAND). Google search fails to produce any non-trivial reliable sources and news search fails to produce any as well. The article has two third-party sources linked, but it's not exactly significant coverage. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 16:14, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 20:45, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per, , , , and . Joe Chill (talk) 04:45, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You are decidedly a better and/or more dedicated researcher than I am. It is clear now that this is notable...is there any way to withdraw an AfD nomination? Ks0stm (T•C•G) 17:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per Joe Chill (I never thought I'd write that). The reliable sources found by Joe Chill clearly prove a National tour of Australia, thereby allowing the band to pass WP:BAND. Bearian (talk) 19:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Joe Chill's finds, notability is established from multiple independent sources and satisfies WP:BAND.  Gongshow  Talk 17:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Joe Chill: all these sources are sufficient to satisfy WP:BAND#1 Victor Silveira (talk) 19:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.