Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Dark Canyon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nomination was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Ha  dg  er  22:39, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Deep Dark Canyon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced article about a film. No evidence of awards. No evidence of professional reviews in google. Stuartyeates (talk) 17:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. I had little difficulty finding reviews: Film Threat, Village Voice. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 18:00, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Meets WP:GNG per and . Northamerica1000(talk) 23:47, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep,  specially in noting that the article is no longer "unreferenced" and that sources were easy to find with various efforts in looking. As the nominator's concerns are proving addressable, I would ask that he might consider a withdrawal.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:24, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Withdraw AfD as per the great work from User:MichaelQSchmidt and User:Tokyogirl79. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.