Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Datewas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Delete. Someone also might want to open a sock investigation regarding this AfD, lol. Missvain (talk) 03:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Deep Datewas

 * – ( View AfD View log )

References do not show the notability of the subject. fails WP:GNG. GermanKity (talk) 10:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 10:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 10:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 10:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 10:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete a WP:BEFORE indicates a dearth of independent, third party sources proving significant coverage, while the sourcing provided is a mix of SPS, blogs, zines and marketplace venues, etc. No indication passing WP:ANBIO through his work. ——  Serial  14:03, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG no indepth coverage available. Jaysonsands (talk) 18:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete this page shouldn't be deleted because there is enough data on Google to proof that Deep Datewas is authentic entity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4055:719:743c:5d53:19a9:6793:c987 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 24 May 2021 (UTC) — 2409:4055:719:743c:5d53:19a9:6793:c987 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete per SN. The IP is correct that there is enough on Google to prove that this person exists, but that isn't the bar we're talking about here - heck, there's enough on Google to prove that I exist, and I am not notable. We don't write Wikipedia articles about someone until there is enough reliable, independent and secondary sources to allow us to do so. With this subject we have blogs, affiliated sites and WP:UGC, but nothing approaching the kind of sourcing we need for a BLP. Girth Summit  (blether)  20:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete There is enough sources to proof authencity of artist, artist is from Punjab region from india that's why his most of news and articles are in punjabi language not in english language. Punjabi film industry use Punjabi language and his most of articles those are in punjabi all are in reference list of his page. i think because of his articles are not in english language, that should not be reason to delete his wikipedia page. He is celebrity for Punjabi film industry not hollywood and punjabi Film industry use punjabi language not english. None of sources are violating wikipedia's guidelines. I prefer not to delete. 10:20, 25 May 2021 (UTC) — Reesashukla (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  — Note to closing admin: Reesashukla (talk • contribs)  is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reesashukla (talk • contribs)
 * This is difficult to assess, because virtually all the sources are decontextualized screenshots. The author implies they're print sources he uploaded himself. They show up as blogs at quick-glance, because the screenshots are Blogspot-hosted. They're in Punjabi and, being images, not amenable to Google Translate. "No sources on the Anglophone Internet" is unsurprising -- a hell of a lot of things don't have sources on the Anglophone Internet -- but what sources the author has given us are completely inscrutable without someone familiar with both notability and the language around. Vaticidalprophet 15:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete I am not from wikipedia daily user but i know article is about real celebrity, I agree about less Information about him. But he is working as a writer from 2015 and now after 6 years he got some Notablity. He is well known writer, novelist in punjabi community in India. If you search his books the artist: myth-Autobiography and nami:myth-autobiography in google you can easily get his books, as hardcopy easily. And his movies also has been released just search his name in imdb. I think keep the article, wait for 2 or 3 months, if information doesn't get new updates then your community what thinks better to do can do. For now we should keep the article. Don't delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.39.118.125 (talk) 18:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)  — 157.39.118.125 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep at google about his books there reliable sources available. his books are everywhere at google,amazon,kobo,goodreads,bol and more platforms in hardcover and digitaly. as a novelist or writer we can easily find him. a bit lack of sources but keep it. i'll contribute for more sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:4900:4203:7bab:f323:395d:85d8:1280 (talk) 06:27, 28 May 2021 (UTC) — 2401:4900:4203:7bab:f323:395d:85d8:1280 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete i cant find evidence of Notability , it fails  WP:GNG Samat lib (talk) 07:43, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep There are links about deep but he is working on few new projects, with indian celebrity sonia mann, yaad grewal and sardar sohi. his project is officially announced in media. we should keep it. link is here, he is in press releases in this photo sitting with film director https://charhdikala.timetv.news/c/59523084 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manisingh0202 (talk • contribs) 03:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC) — Manisingh0202 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete Although I take Vaticidalprophet's point, the article in the first image, "ਅਜੋਕੀ ਗੰਪਲੀ ਰਾਜਨੀਤੀ ਦੇ ਪਾਜ ਉਪੇੜੇਗੀ ਫਿਲਮ 'ਲੰਕਾ'", is about the film Lanka, but is not deep coverage of Deep. The second, full page, image is too hard to read. Reesashukla can try to sway opinion by more precisely identifying the piece (Punjabi title and column) and providing a translation of 2-3 paragraphs to demonstrate that it is addresses Deep directly and in detail, but one book review will not be enough to prove notability. If this isn't vanispamcruftisement, it's fanspamcruftisement. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.