Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Dhudiya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedied as spam and salted. Peridon (talk) 17:56, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Deep Dhudiya

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. No reliable sources. No GHits/GNews/GBooks hits, other than social media. Promotional. CSD tags repeatedly removed by IP. GregJackP  Boomer!   14:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - as per nom - This article has twice previously been deleted (and once for a version without the space in the name), & was for a while protected against re-creation, but once that protection expired the same user came along & produced something obviously non-compliant with Wikipedia's requirements for an article. No justification has been given for the repeated removal of the speedy tags. - David Biddulph (talk) 14:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)


 * To add insult to injury, one of the IPs (106.78.159.225) who had repeatedly removed the speedy deletion tags then decided to remove the AFD tag, despite the crystal clear instructions to prohbit such action. - David Biddulph (talk) 14:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete The person is non-notable at this time. This is more like a LinkedIn profile than an encyclopedia article.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  15:38, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Per nom. The Legend   of Zorro  16:18, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete and permanently salt both entries. There's no notability here and it seems to be fairly clear that the article is only being used to spam, and once any temporary salting is up, they'll try to re-add the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   16:51, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, it looks like this was meant to have been permanently salted, as the talk page for the article shows a permanent salting. Since this is so blatantly promotional, I'll tag it as a speedy promo. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   16:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I would also recommend blocking the original editor, as his only edits have been to add himself to various places, as can be seen with this edit. It's pretty obvious that he'll just keep trying to add himself, so I think he's beyond the point of good will. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   16:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.