Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Medhi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 01:00, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Deep Medhi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Except The Assam Tribune ref (more than an essay, suspicious promotion), all are primary sources. Fails WP:ACADEMIC, WP:ANYBIO, WP:RS and fails minimum 3 coverage refs. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 14:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Engineering. - Signed by NeverTry4Me  Talk 14:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Heavy citations on Google Scholar, IEEE Fellow, and named professorship are obvious passes of WP:PROF #C1, #C3, and #C5, respectively, so the nominator's WP:VAGUEWAVE towards that notability guideline shows at best a clear lack of attention. Primary sourcing is not an issue for academic notability, which does not rely on depth of independent sourcing. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:35, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep IEEE Fellow is a quintessential pass of one of the easiest wiki-notability criteria to verify. Likewise for holding a Curators' Distinguished Professor title. The citation profile looks strong, too, with 9 publications having over 100 citations apiece, the top two entries being books that have also had published reviews . The page needs de-CV-ification, but that's not a matter for this forum. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:55, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Assam-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.