Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Agrawal (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 18:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Deepak Agrawal
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO WP:NMUSIC. Lack WP:SIGCOV. WP:TOOSOON case. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 03:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 03:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: Weak Keep. found only a handful of references. https://www.deccanchronicle.com/entertainment/music/250419/music-composer-and-lyricist-deepak-agrawal-makes-it-big-in-bollywood.html https://www.thestatesman.com/inspiration-hub/upcoming-bollywood-lyricist-music-composer-deepak-agrawal-gives-credit-father-musical-career-1502928128.html. Although it is possible that these are paid PR interviews. ChunnuBhai (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above sources are paid interviews and the author was (at least would later become) a paid editor. I am leaning delete, not finding sufficient coverage which can be demonstrated not to be PR. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Thjarkur's reasoning above Spiderone  10:49, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:09, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Was previously deleted after a general consensus in AFD. It was also CSDed and deleted as WP:G4. Ref 1, 3, and 10 appear to be paid pieces and the article still lacks independent sources.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.