Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Pun Magar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:17, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Deepak Pun Magar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsuccessful political candidate so fails WP:NPOL. I can't find any evidence of passing WP:GNG in a search of his Nepali name and none of the references in the article show significant coverage other than the ones from non-independent or self-published sources. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 06:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 06:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 06:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. fails WP:POLITICIAN. GermanKity (talk) 06:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete couldn't find any RS for this, all social media. Fails GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:26, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:NPOLITICIAN and WP:GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftify - most of the source are primary. One mention in tv news can be counted as a coverage, however there is no multiple sources to verify it. At such situation, draftifying would be the right thing to do. nirmal (talk) 10:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * What improvement could possibly take place in Draft to an article that so clearly fails WP:NPOL? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:39, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * -Good observation. I agree, draftifying seldom improves the article unless the major contributor actively takes part in the deletion discussion. In this particular case, as I mentioned earlier, among the references, 1 and 2 indicates he has some coverage in media. Obviously it needs to be translated from Nepali to english, so anyone can understand those documents. Draftifying will give the major editors some time to improve the references, possibly a chance to add English references too. Regards! nirmal (talk) 11:09, 16 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL QuantumRealm  (meow • pawtrack) 10:36, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftify according to refs indicate he is a politician of Nepal. All the refs are in the Nepali language, however, there are multiple problems in article writing Like unmanaged refs list, bio in one paragraph. Draftifying is the right place to improve refs listing and article writing. Parbat Katwal (talk) 11:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Do any of the references actually show significant coverage? Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:28, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete fails both WP:NPOLITICIAN and WP:GNG. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Draftification is for topics with potential merit. No amount of editing can make a non-notable topic notable. So, draftification is out of question for this topic. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:18, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.