Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepend


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. Owen&times; &#9742;  19:06, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Deepend
Design company that went under in 2001 acc to article in The Register, does not seem sufficiently notable. Flapdragon 12:10, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Eusebeus 13:36, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, link provided establishes notability. Kappa 01:03, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd say that's debatable. The nearest it comes to WP:CORP is "multiple published works" but that might be stretching it. Flapdragon 13:55, 22 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.