Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deeproute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:02, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Deeproute

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

No indication of importance, no third-party sources, and most of this is written as a an essay article. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 18:13, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, no indication of notability, seems like a combination of advertising and a game guide. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:18, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 27 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete There are no independent, reliable sources provided to establish notability of this website based game, and much of the text appears to be a copyright violation from the game's website. Cullen328 (talk) 07:00, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per NawlinWiki, no third-party sources and no notability. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 17:25, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey! Isn't that per nom? :) &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 17:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * Perhaps when there are more than the 1000 current users of the game, it will be considered "notable". Is the threshold for article entry 10k? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.56.18.60 (talk) 08:09, 8 December 2010 (UTC)