Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deer Creek Broadcasting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Deer Creek Broadcasting

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Owner of six radio stations, all in one fairly small market. Probably does not meet the GNG. Raymie (t • c) 07:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 11:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 11:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  20:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  20:08, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Broadcasting companies are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist, but must be shown as the subject of enough reliable source coverage to get over WP:GNG — with the added bonus that the coverage also has to pass WP:CORPDEPTH, by being more than just purely local. But the only source shown here at all is not coverage about the company, but just nominally namechecks its existence as the current employer of a person who's being quoted in the context of having helped the city to acquire a heritage airplane rather than in the context of his work as a broadcaster. This is not the kind of coverage it takes to make a small local company notable enough for a standalone article. Bearcat (talk) 16:38, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.