Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deezy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by User:Jimfbleak per CSD G11, "Unambiguous advertising or promotion" and CSD G4, "Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion". (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 08:17, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Deezy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:NACTOR. majority of the sources are track listing or SPS. CSD was challenged by the creator of the previously speedied version.  Ish dar  ian  12:04, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Sigh... It's been speedied five times and protected against recreation twice. Let's bury it for good. Self-promotion by non-notable  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  12:32, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Terrible Judgements For them to even not give enough time to edit and gather information is not fair nor is it jusifiable. I'm sure you want to put some more deletions under your belt, but do it to another page. There was still NO LOGICAL explanation on to why the page was marked for deletion in the first place because there are COUNTLESS amounts of pages that lack resources and verifiable information. Please stop doing the absolute most & enjoy your day gentlemen. User talk:Urbaninformative Question?  —Preceding undated comment added 16:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete All info that could make him somewhat notable is unsourced and I doubt some of it is true at all (signed to Young Money? featured on We Are Young Money? Google doesn't seem to think so.) Even if that was true still fails WP:NMUSIC. Urbaninformative's comment above is WP:OTHER and I'd also suggest him to keep civil. 2Flows (talk) 17:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt No evidence of WP:MUSIC notability whatsoever. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Martin 4 5 1  23:29, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep There seems to be enough evidence of WP:MUSIC notability. Also it has been updated with more/better sources. hiphopfeign Talk 19:32, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete again Previous discussion covers it. No media coverage (or any other reliable sources) cited to establish WP:NOTABILITY. Most of the references that are cited are either IMDB-like artist pages that duplicate the same information, or links to purchase art; these are not the same as media coverage, nor indicative of widespread respect in the field. Appears to be simply self-promotional content, created by a user whose username indicates they are a member of the same band as this artist.  Josh3580 talk/hist 04:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.