Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Def


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 01:39, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Def
Wikipedia is not a slang dictionary, and should not include such things. Thatfunkymunki 03:59, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep because of the definition of DEF that points to Design Exchange Format -- Astrokey44 |talk 05:17, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as disambiguation; however, definition should not be there (per WP:NOT). --Alan Au 06:15, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per above. Royboycrashfan 06:27, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, but bring in line with disambig style and get rid of the def'n. Peyna 17:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Alan Au. Rory096 20:04, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep'/cleanup. mikka (t) 23:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. See Talk:Def. If Taint (slang) can be in Wikipedia, this Def term with a much more rich history definitely can. Alexander 007 23:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but clean-up with sourced, verifiable content about the origin of the usage; as opposed to the Original Research "urban dictionary" definition now there.--LeFlyman 01:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.