Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defacto.am


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. this is a "weak" close. All that has been verified here is "it exists" - there's no independent sources showing notability. We don't AGF with WP:V. So delete, without prejuduce to recreation IF sources are given to assert notability. If recreated with a sourced assertion, then don't delete as a repost. Scott Mac (Doc) 21:47, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Defacto.am

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   05:10, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep A Google search turns up a few references, but none in English. AGF that a national news service has some degree of notability, I would not advocate deletion. Warrah (talk) 15:52, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions.  —Milowent (talk) 17:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Site does exist, and has been cited as a source at least 23 times on the English wikipedia.  The name appears to refer to the "de facto" independent status of Nagorno-Karabakh Republic.  I added it to the Armenia related deletion discussions so maybe we can get an armenian expert to weigh in or find more sources (if they exist).--Milowent (talk) 18:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete non notable "news service".  JBsupreme  ( talk ) 09:28, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.