Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defect detector

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was being bold and speedy keeping --SPUI (talk) 4 July 2005 03:29 (UTC)

Defect detector
move to Wiktionary 203.98.57.97 3 July 2005 18:41 (UTC)
 * Strong keep This article is part of WikiProject Trains. slambo July 3, 2005 18:49 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, as it is more than just a dictionary definition. --Alex12 3 3 July 2005 18:54 (UTC)
 * Keep, valid topic, not a dicdef. JYolkowski // talk 3 July 2005 19:05 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, more than just a dictdef, perfectly valid article. UkPaolo 3 July 2005 19:20 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Should certainly not have been nominated for deletion - please do not refer obviously notable articles--File Éireann 3 July 2005 20:33 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. This is an important, notable topic in railroading.  Sanction User:203.98.57.97 for bad-faith VFD nominations intended to WP:POINT. Kaibabsquirrel 3 July 2005 19:21 (UTC)
 * I agree with sanctioning user 203.98.57.97 for above reasons. --Alex12 3 3 July 2005 20:52 (UTC)


 * Keep more than a dictionary def. should be kept. Jtkiefer July 4, 2005 03:13 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.