Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defence and Garrison Museum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 23:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Defence and Garrison Museum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:ORG. declined prod with no reason. I could no indepth coverage for its Danish name ""Forsvars- og Garnisonsmuseum" only directory listings. LibStar (talk) 00:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 11:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 11:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 11:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 11:29, 20 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Easily meets WP:ORG/GNG with online sources alone, and they should have been added before. -- Sam Sing! 13:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Two of us have found and added references, including a news story I found through the German Wikipedia entry. I believe it now demonstrates notability. Yngvadottir (talk) 14:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep -- passes WP:ORG through significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. — Cactus Writer (talk) 18:13, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Sam Sailor and CactusWriter. Buckshot06 (talk) 05:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.