Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defibration

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Nufy8 22:09, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Defibration
No matches in google for a medical term called 'defibration'. The term is used to describe a process for removing fiber from pulpy mass. This appears to be a WP:NOR issue. C HAIRBOY 15:13, 2 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. - C HAIRBOY 15:13, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Original research or hoax - delete. Demogorgon's Soup-taster 15:14, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete (possibly redirect to Defibrillation) --Doc (?) 18:28, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * No useful content. Original research. I think redirect to Defibrillation because that's what I thought it was at first glance and it's a very plausible misspelling/typo/misunderstanding. But Delete would be fine, too. Dpbsmith (talk) 18:53, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, but don't redirect. A legitimate article could be written with the same name as it appears to be an industrial process. -- Kjkolb 07:03, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's completely bogus as written. - Nunh-huh 07:09, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, but don't redirect to Defibrillation because the definition of this bogus 'article' is not remotely related to defibrillation, it will only cause confusion.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.