Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Definitive Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Definitive Technology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't see notability here. Of the three refs, two relate to an acquisition by one company of another, and the other is an advertisement for its products. Not notability as required by WP:CORP  Velella  Velella Talk 00:03, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:51, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:51, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:09, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:09, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now as there's nothing here currently at all to fully convince better notability and improvement for a better article. SwisterTwister   talk  06:09, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.