Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Degankhel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Yusufzai. ✗ plicit  23:46, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Degankhel

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Currently unsourced, and I can find no reliable sources. The tribe may exist, but it certainly appears to fail WP:GNG. If reliable sources can be found, I would suggest merging with Pashtun. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 19:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups, Afghanistan,  and Pakistan. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 19:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pashtuns or Yusufzai. This article's template at the bottom shows that Degankhel is a sub-tribe of the larger Yusufzai tribe...Ngrewal1 (talk) 23:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Yusufzai (or Pashtuns if there is a consensus for this target) per above, lacks sources for a standalone article.  // Timothy :: talk  06:09, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm good with redirecting to Yusufzai instead of Pashtuns. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 11:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Yusufzai where the sub-tribe is listed. CycloneYoris talk! 23:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.