Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Degresslessness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 23:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Degresslessness
Video game cruft - the game is certainly notable, but a cheat code is hardly worthy of its own entry. Also, only eight Google hits, so seems like possible original research. Dsreyn 13:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


 * A cheat code is easily verifiable -- either it's in the source or it isn't, so either it works or it doesn't. In my opinion, that means WP:NOR doesn't apply. However, there is no excuse for this to exist as a separate entry. Merge to Doom II and redirect if verified; delete if not. Alba 13:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment. It does seem strange thought that a cheat code for such a popular game doesn't have more web hits. Dsreyn 13:35, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Google the actual code, IDDQD, it gets hits. Tyciol 17:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Normally I'd say redirect to god mode, but this isn't even the correct spelling. It's actually "Degreelessness". Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I've never heard it called that. Redirecting it to god mode is a good idea though, I just didn't know about that article when I made this. Tyciol 17:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Degresslessness +Doom gets 2 Google hits, and one of them is this article. Degreelessness +Doom gets over 1000 hits.  I'm 99.9999% sure "Degresslessness" is a misspelling. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Starblind is right. Delete as an uncommon misspelling. Danny Lilithborne 18:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not only is it misspelled but the subject is about one of the most trivial, unencyclopedic things I've seen in the AfD. An article for a cheat code?  Come on!  Think what kind of precedent it would set to keep this.  Wikipedia is not a gameguide not is it a place to collect random, unencyclopedic information.  --The Way 19:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a misspelling. Possibly add into the God mode article.  --Richard 19:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe .RON   talk  23:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Daveydw ee b ( chat/patch ) 23:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * delete; a misspelling and too trivial for its own article. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  wikipedia is not a cheat/gamefaq site. it is also misspelled. JoeSmack Talk (p-review!) 01:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong, Speedy Delete - This has got to be a joke. Keeping this article just makes a mockery of the whole point of having policies and guidelines on wikipedia. The Kinslayer 10:48, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.