Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dehan Chen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Note: I did not evaluate the claim of paid editing in my consideration of this close. However, following the close, I did archive the relevant Elance request Doc James referred to at the Internet Archive, and I see their point. --j⚛e deckertalk 14:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Dehan Chen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While the doctor appears to be quite accomplished, there is no indication of particular notability by third parties. The references are either directory listings or similar profile pages that nearly all doctors have. No independent indications of unique notability worthy of an encyclopedia article. Zim Zala Bim talk  03:46, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Support This article was written as someone paid to have it written. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 04:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:PROF. Nothing to indicate he's more than an average doctor. BakerStMD T&#124;C 16:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - The subject is not just a average doctor. He was Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Clinical Instructor at the New York University School of Medicine. proof in the NYU Med Bulletin. He has seven publications about his research in top international medical journals. He has received several awards including Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society Award and Healthgrades Honor Roll. He has thirdparty sources besides derectory links, , . He has also notable educational background. Don't they all pass wp: notability? Happiest persoN (talk) 08:07, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Part of the concern is that they paid you to write this article. I do not see anywhere were you disclosed this. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 10:44, 30 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. I don't see anything here that rises to the level of notability. Doc James, what is the evidence for your paid editing accusation? If true, that would also be a good reason for deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * There was a job posted on Elance for the writing of this article. Per WP:OUTING it is not clear if one is allowed to link to it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.