Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dehiscence

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 6, 2005 21:46 (UTC)

Dehiscence
An immaculately crafted dicdef. As I have argued elsewhere (Pump (policy), "Wiktionarizing, etc"), the creation of first-rate dicdefs is something that requires considerable practice and care, and I for one cannot believe that somebody capable of this will fail to notice that WP is not a dictionary. Thus for a brand new yet good dicdef on a technical or general subject (if not for vulgarisms, cruft, etc.), I assume a copyvio. Do not transwiki; instead, delete. -- Hoary June 28, 2005 08:35 (UTC)
 * Copyvio. Kappa 28 June 2005 09:29 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.