Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deidre Behar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 03:02, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Deidre Behar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Some notability existing, but very shaky. Most sources are blogs and she has only 4 artices on Fox. Looks like to early for an article Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Strongly oppose this proposal since this article is well-sourced, researched, and written. As you concede yourself, notability existing both for her affiliation with Entertainment Tonight, her ties to Jose Behar, and the multiple articles on her career.--JumpLike23 (talk) 07:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * See also: on wikipedia, from another editor at AfterBuzz TV, describing her as a notable young host; and independently included on the Defy Media page; ClevverNews has millions of views and she was a host. Thus, her work is well known. referencing WP:ENT; WP:JOURNALIST
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. I easily found some good sources, such as here. She is not just a producer (and as a female that itself is notable) but is also as a reporter.  It's low culture, but so what? Bearian (talk) 13:02, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as per and . Like Bearian said, low culture but so what?--Tomwsulcer (talk) 20:45, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep after reading the sources list and despite nominating it at the first place, I withdraw my nonimation. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 18:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.